IETH vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IETH (Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. IETH is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. IETH charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

IETH vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IETH achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.32% return.

IETH

• 1D: -3.27%
• 1M: -17.57%
• YTD: -38.45%
• 6M: -35.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IETH vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IETH Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF	-38.45%	-27.34%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IETH and RBIL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

IETH vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IETH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IETH vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IETH	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.35	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	6.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	42.95	—

Drawdowns

IETH vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IETH drawdown since its inception was -59.55%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETH and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IETH	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.55%	-0.52%	-59.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.45%	-0.50%	-56.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.29%	-0.07%	-38.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IETH	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.54%	0.95%	+59.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.54%	1.07%	+59.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.54%	1.07%	+59.47%

IETH vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IETH has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

IETH vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.52%, more than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IETH Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF	50.52%	18.26%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IETH and RBIL in my portfolio?

IETH and RBIL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IETH or RBIL?

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IETH or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for IETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IETH or RBIL?

IETH has the higher dividend yield at 50.52%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between IETH and RBIL?

IETH is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for IETH and 0.17% for RBIL.