IETC vs. QQQ
IETC (iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. IETC is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IETC returned 17.84%/yr vs 17.86%/yr for QQQ. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
IETC vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return.
IETC
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
IETC vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 12.03% | 19.56% | 37.57% | 54.35% | -32.78% | 29.73% | 46.59% | 43.09% | -3.52% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IETC and QQQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IETC and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IETC vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IETC
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IETC
QQQ
Communication Services
IETC
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IETC
QQQ
Industrials
IETC
QQQ
Financial Services
IETC
QQQ
Real Estate
IETC
QQQ
Healthcare
IETC
QQQ
Basic Materials
IETC
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IETC
-
QQQ
Energy
IETC
-
QQQ
Utilities
IETC
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IETC vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IETC
QQQ
IETC vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IETC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.44 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.42 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 13.14 | -9.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IETC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 2.57 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.80 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.41 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
IETC vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IETC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -82.97% | +44.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -11.96% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | -22.77% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.48% | -35.12% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -0.74% | -3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -32.78% | +24.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 3.11% | +4.40% |
Volatility
IETC vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that IETC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IETC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 4.51% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 12.10% | +4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.09% | 15.94% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 22.37% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 22.29% | +3.09% |
IETC vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IETC and QQQ have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IETC vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 0.95% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IETC and QQQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IETC has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.86% vs 17.84% for IETC. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IETC and QQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.35% for IETC.
IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IETC and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer