IETC vs. LQAI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IETC (iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF) and LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while LQAI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by QRAFT. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IETC returned 30.45% vs 42.11% for LQAI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IETC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LQAI.

Performance

IETC vs. LQAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly lower than LQAI's 22.12% return.

IETC

• 1D: -2.13%
• 1M: 11.52%
• YTD: 13.88%
• 6M: 12.87%
• 1Y: 30.45%
• 3Y*: 30.53%
• 5Y*: 18.23%
• 10Y*: —

LQAI

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 10.98%
• YTD: 22.12%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 42.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IETC vs. LQAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	13.88%	19.56%	37.57%	11.59%
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	22.12%	13.70%	27.82%	9.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IETC and LQAI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.82

The correlation between IETC and LQAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

IETC vs. LQAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IETC	LQAI
Technology	79.1%	40.4%
Communication Services	8.4%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	14.7%
Industrials	3.7%	1.1%
Financial Services	3.1%	8.7%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.6%
Healthcare	0.1%	4.1%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.5%
Energy	-	6.6%
Utilities	-	4.4%

Return for Risk

IETC vs. LQAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IETC

IETC Risk / Return Rank: 34
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 28

LQAI

LQAI Risk / Return Rank: 78
LQAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LQAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LQAI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LQAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LQAI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IETC vs. LQAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IETC	LQAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.74	-1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.49	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.49	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	4.23	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	12.18	-8.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IETC vs. LQAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IETC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the LQAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IETC and LQAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IETC	LQAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	2.74	-1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.74	-0.87

Drawdowns

IETC vs. LQAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than LQAI's maximum drawdown of -21.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and LQAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IETC	LQAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.48%	-21.24%	-17.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.19%	-10.00%	-11.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-0.22%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-3.06%	-5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.51%	3.47%	+4.04%

Volatility

IETC vs. LQAI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) at 5.29%. This indicates that IETC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IETC	LQAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	5.29%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.49%	10.93%	+5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.04%	15.43%	+5.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.53%	16.98%	+7.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.37%	16.98%	+8.39%

IETC vs. LQAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IETC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LQAI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IETC vs. LQAI - Dividend Comparison

IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than LQAI's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.52%	0.79%	0.92%	0.73%	0.48%	0.95%	1.27%
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	0.89%	1.14%	0.69%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IETC and LQAI in my portfolio?

IETC and LQAI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IETC or LQAI?

IETC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to LQAI (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs LQAI's -21.24%.

Which ETF is better, IETC or LQAI?

On 1-year performance, LQAI leads with 42.11% vs 30.45% for IETC. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, LQAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IETC or LQAI?

Over the 1-year period, LQAI has performed better with a 42.11% return vs 30.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IETC or LQAI?

IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LQAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IETC or LQAI?

LQAI has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.34% for IETC.

What is the main difference between IETC and LQAI?

IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while LQAI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and QRAFT. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IETC and 0.75% for LQAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.