PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESGX vs. VTWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESGX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than VTWAX's 13.15% return.


IESGX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.69%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.86%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*

VTWAX

1D
0.37%
1M
5.68%
YTD
13.15%
6M
14.09%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
8.22%19.65%19.59%26.67%-21.08%19.93%15.91%19.70%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
13.15%22.43%16.43%21.85%-18.02%18.17%16.67%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IESGX and VTWAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.95

The correlation between IESGX and VTWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESGX vs. VTWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESGX
IESGX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWAX
VTWAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IESGXVTWAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.19

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

14.26

-4.04

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VTWAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESGX and VTWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IESGXVTWAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.49

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.77

-0.03

Drawdowns

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESGX drawdown since its inception was -32.15%, smaller than the maximum VTWAX drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESGX and VTWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESGXVTWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.15%

-34.20%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-9.64%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.86%

-16.43%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-26.40%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-5.30%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.15%

+0.09%

Volatility

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Volatility Comparison

Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESGXVTWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.55%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

9.82%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

12.37%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

15.71%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

18.20%

-1.43%

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IESGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWAX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IESGX vs. VTWAX - Dividend Comparison

IESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than VTWAX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
1.10%1.19%0.06%0.77%3.29%1.43%0.58%1.54%1.41%0.91%0.21%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.56%1.80%1.92%2.06%2.17%1.79%1.64%2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IESGX and VTWAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IESGX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to VTWAX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESGX dropped -32.15% vs VTWAX's -34.20%.

VTWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESGX and VTWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer