PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESGX vs. GQRPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IESGX having a 7.65% return and GQRPX slightly higher at 7.89%.


IESGX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.58%
6M
6.76%
YTD
7.65%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
12.11%
ALL TIME*
12.13%

GQRPX

1D
0.70%
1M
1.08%
6M
4.23%
YTD
7.89%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
7.65%19.65%19.59%26.67%-21.08%19.93%15.91%15.29%
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
7.89%0.67%19.98%19.56%-3.77%16.94%14.55%12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IESGX and GQRPX is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019

0.72

The correlation between IESGX and GQRPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESGX vs. GQRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IESGX
IESGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRPX
GQRPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GQRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESGXGQRPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

1.37

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

3.09

+3.53

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the GQRPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESGX and GQRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESGX drawdown since its inception was -32.15%, which is greater than GQRPX's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESGX and GQRPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESGXGQRPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.15%

-28.88%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-7.02%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.86%

-16.49%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-20.39%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-3.25%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-4.95%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

3.11%

-0.68%

Volatility

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Volatility Comparison

Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) at 2.79%. This indicates that IESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESGXGQRPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

2.79%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

7.53%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

9.50%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

14.68%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

17.15%

-0.38%

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IESGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRPX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

IESGX vs. GQRPX - Dividend Comparison

IESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than GQRPX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
7.04%7.60%6.35%1.22%2.93%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
1.10%1.19%0.06%0.77%3.29%1.43%0.58%1.54%1.41%0.91%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


IESGX and GQRPX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IESGX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to GQRPX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESGX dropped -32.15% vs GQRPX's -28.88%.

IESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESGX and GQRPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer