IESGX vs. GQRIX
IESGX (Sit ESG Growth Fund) and GQRIX (GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, IESGX returned 10.12%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for GQRIX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IESGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GQRIX.
Performance
IESGX vs. GQRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IESGX having a 7.08% return and GQRIX slightly lower at 6.95%.
IESGX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
GQRIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
IESGX vs. GQRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESGX Sit ESG Growth Fund | 7.08% | 19.65% | 19.59% | 26.67% | -21.08% | 19.93% | 15.91% | 15.29% |
GQRIX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 6.95% | 0.91% | 20.18% | 19.79% | -3.64% | 17.13% | 14.75% | 12.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESGX and GQRIX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IESGX and GQRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESGX vs. GQRIX — Risk / Return Rank
IESGX
GQRIX
IESGX vs. GQRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESGX | GQRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.06 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 2.52 | +4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESGX vs. GQRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESGX drawdown since its inception was -32.15%, which is greater than GQRIX's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESGX and GQRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESGX | GQRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.15% | -28.86% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -7.00% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.86% | -16.47% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -20.29% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -4.17% | +3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -4.90% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.94% | -0.53% |
Volatility
IESGX vs. GQRIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) is 3.68%, while GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that IESGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESGX | GQRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.94% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 7.57% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 9.50% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 14.73% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 17.20% | -0.46% |
IESGX vs. GQRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IESGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IESGX vs. GQRIX - Dividend Comparison
IESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than GQRIX's 7.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRIX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 7.43% | 7.94% | 6.46% | 1.39% | 2.99% | 1.65% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IESGX Sit ESG Growth Fund | 1.11% | 1.19% | 0.06% | 0.77% | 3.29% | 1.43% | 0.58% | 1.54% | 1.41% | 0.91% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IESGX and GQRIX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GQRIX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to IESGX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESGX dropped -32.15% vs GQRIX's -28.86%.
IESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IESGX and GQRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer