PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESGX vs. AGLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESGX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than AGLOX's 26.71% return.


IESGX

1D
-0.86%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
4.95%
6M
4.31%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*

AGLOX

1D
1.40%
1M
4.44%
YTD
26.71%
6M
26.53%
1Y
41.74%
3Y*
20.44%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
4.95%19.65%19.59%26.67%-21.08%19.93%15.91%26.41%-7.38%23.71%
AGLOX
Ariel Global Fund
26.71%23.22%6.55%12.40%-5.47%11.53%7.70%15.98%-6.03%15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IESGX and AGLOX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2016

0.80

The correlation between IESGX and AGLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESGX vs. AGLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESGX
IESGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AGLOX
AGLOX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AGLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AGLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESGXAGLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.59

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.97

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

14.81

-6.23

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the AGLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESGX and AGLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESGX drawdown since its inception was -32.15%, which is greater than AGLOX's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESGX and AGLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESGXAGLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.15%

-24.72%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-10.66%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.86%

-12.94%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-16.77%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

0.00%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-3.37%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.85%

-0.54%

Volatility

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) is 3.90%, while Ariel Global Fund (AGLOX) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that IESGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESGXAGLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

6.04%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

11.87%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

14.02%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

12.89%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

13.24%

+3.52%

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IESGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AGLOX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

IESGX vs. AGLOX - Dividend Comparison

IESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than AGLOX's 12.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGLOX
Ariel Global Fund
12.93%16.38%27.80%18.51%4.82%2.00%0.85%4.39%3.42%4.48%2.65%0.81%
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
1.13%1.19%0.06%0.77%3.29%1.43%0.58%1.54%1.41%0.91%0.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IESGX and AGLOX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGLOX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to IESGX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESGX dropped -32.15% vs AGLOX's -24.72%.

AGLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESGX and AGLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer