IEMU.L vs. MMS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEMU.L (iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - IEMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEMU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.

Performance

IEMU.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IEMU.L is traded in USD, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

IEMU.L

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: 19.54%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: —

MMS.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMU.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IEMU.L iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	8.00%	39.99%	0.46%
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	-1.72%	7.55%	-1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMU.L and MMS.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024	0.37

IEMU.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEMU.L	MMS.L
Financial Services	24.0%	16.9%
Industrials	21.0%	21.8%
Technology	15.9%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.9%
Utilities	6.4%	3.4%
Healthcare	5.6%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	1.7%
Communication Services	4.3%	3.0%
Basic Materials	4.0%	5.9%
Energy	3.9%	5.6%
Real Estate	0.9%	12.8%

Return for Risk

IEMU.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMU.L

IEMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
IEMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
IEMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
IEMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
IEMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IEMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMU.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMU.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMU.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMU.L	MMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IEMU.L	MMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.30%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	—	—

IEMU.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMU.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEMU.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMU.L and MMS.L in my portfolio?

IEMU.L and MMS.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IEMU.L or MMS.L?

On fees, IEMU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEMU.L or MMS.L?

IEMU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.

What is the main difference between IEMU.L and MMS.L?

IEMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IEMU.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.