IEMGX vs. PRMSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEMGX (Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and PRMSX (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, IEMGX returned 11.92%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for PRMSX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEMGX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for PRMSX.

Performance

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMGX achieves a 37.69% return, which is significantly higher than PRMSX's 31.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMGX has outperformed PRMSX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while PRMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.

IEMGX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 10.57%
• YTD: 37.69%
• 6M: 42.32%
• 1Y: 77.09%
• 3Y*: 29.87%
• 5Y*: 9.53%
• 10Y*: 11.92%

PRMSX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 10.31%
• YTD: 31.72%
• 6M: 35.77%
• 1Y: 62.90%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: 8.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund	37.69%	46.12%	0.76%	15.09%	-24.13%	-2.91%	16.80%	25.23%	-19.85%	44.53%
PRMSX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund	31.72%	32.46%	-1.72%	2.08%	-23.35%	-10.47%	17.63%	26.51%	-16.20%	42.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMGX and PRMSX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011	0.94

The correlation between IEMGX and PRMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IEMGX vs. PRMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMGX

IEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 95
IEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
IEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

PRMSX

PRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 91
PRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMGX	PRMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.22	3.42	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.86	4.20	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.63	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.79	4.79	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.01	19.45	+2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is comparable to the PRMSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMGX and PRMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMGX	PRMSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.22	3.42	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.16	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.45	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.37	+0.06

Drawdowns

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum PRMSX drawdown of -71.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMGX and PRMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMGX	PRMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.87%	-71.13%	+29.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.85%	-13.56%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.58%	-16.47%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.75%	-43.13%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.87%	-46.28%	+4.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.47%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.10%	-21.11%	+6.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	3.33%	+0.63%

Volatility

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) have volatilities of 8.44% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMGX	PRMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.44%	8.24%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.31%	16.35%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.78%	18.98%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	17.89%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	18.57%	-0.26%

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PRMSX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMGX vs. PRMSX - Dividend Comparison

IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than PRMSX's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund	4.36%	6.01%	4.66%	1.99%	4.22%	19.49%	3.91%	2.69%	1.01%	1.39%	1.17%	1.53%
PRMSX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund	0.43%	0.57%	0.35%	1.09%	1.17%	8.26%	0.49%	1.24%	0.61%	0.18%	0.69%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMGX and PRMSX in my portfolio?

IEMGX and PRMSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEMGX or PRMSX?

IEMGX has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to PRMSX (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMGX dropped -41.87% vs PRMSX's -71.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 3.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.