PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMGX vs. IEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMGX achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than IEFA's 11.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEMGX having a 9.90% annualized return and IEFA not far behind at 9.53%.


IEMGX

1D
4.16%
1M
-5.97%
6M
9.37%
YTD
22.74%
1Y
50.07%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
6.71%

IEFA

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.98%
6M
6.18%
YTD
11.62%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.53%
ALL TIME*
8.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$832.02M$871.11M$936.56M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMGX
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund
22.74%46.12%0.76%15.09%-24.13%-2.91%16.80%25.23%-19.85%44.53%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
11.62%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMGX and IEFA is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.74

The correlation between IEMGX and IEFA shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMGX vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEMGX
IEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGXIEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.13

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

8.15

+1.70

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the IEFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMGX and IEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMGX and IEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGXIEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-34.78%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.64%

-11.50%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-13.76%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.33%

-30.41%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

-34.78%

-7.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.21%

-0.64%

-13.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-6.63%

-8.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

2.99%

+2.32%

Volatility

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison

Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 4.75%. This indicates that IEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGXIEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

4.75%

+6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

13.63%

+11.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.72%

15.69%

+12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

16.63%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

17.03%

+1.95%

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEMGX vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison

IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than IEFA's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.35%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%
IEMGX
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund
4.89%6.01%4.66%1.99%4.22%19.49%3.91%2.69%1.01%1.39%1.17%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMGX and IEFA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMGX has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to IEFA (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMGX dropped -41.87% vs IEFA's -34.78%.

IEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMGX and IEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer