IEMGX vs. FPADX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEMGX (Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, IEMGX returned 11.92%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for FPADX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEMGX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMGX achieves a 37.69% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 28.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMGX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.31% annualized return.

IEMGX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 10.57%
• YTD: 37.69%
• 6M: 42.32%
• 1Y: 77.09%
• 3Y*: 29.87%
• 5Y*: 9.53%
• 10Y*: 11.92%

FPADX

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 8.03%
• YTD: 28.80%
• 6M: 31.68%
• 1Y: 55.65%
• 3Y*: 24.57%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund	37.69%	46.12%	0.76%	15.09%	-24.13%	-2.91%	16.80%	25.23%	-19.85%	44.53%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	28.80%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMGX and FPADX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011	0.94

The correlation between IEMGX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IEMGX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMGX

IEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 95
IEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
IEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMGX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.22	3.24	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.86	4.12	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.60	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.79	4.34	+1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.01	17.23	+4.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is higher than the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMGX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMGX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.22	3.24	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.45	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.58	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.37	+0.07

Drawdowns

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMGX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMGX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.87%	-39.16%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.85%	-13.28%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.58%	-16.09%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.75%	-37.00%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.87%	-39.16%	-2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.96%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.10%	-13.26%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	3.34%	+0.62%

Volatility

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) at 7.71%. This indicates that IEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMGX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.44%	7.71%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.31%	15.44%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.78%	17.83%	+3.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	17.11%	+0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	17.82%	+0.49%

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMGX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than FPADX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.83%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund	4.36%	6.01%	4.66%	1.99%	4.22%	19.49%	3.91%	2.69%	1.01%	1.39%	1.17%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMGX and FPADX in my portfolio?

IEMGX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEMGX or FPADX?

IEMGX has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to FPADX (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMGX dropped -41.87% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.