IEMGX vs. BEMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX).
IEMGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 10, 2011. BEMIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2011.
Performance
IEMGX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IEMGX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 4.52% | 46.12% | 0.76% | 15.09% | -24.13% | -2.91% | 16.80% | 25.23% | -19.85% | 44.53% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 5.83% | 47.83% | 4.01% | 22.53% | -15.91% | 1.68% | -6.17% | 18.60% | -15.56% | 26.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMGX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than BEMIX's 5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMGX has outperformed BEMIX with an annualized return of 8.85%, while BEMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.
IEMGX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -11.83%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 47.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
BEMIX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMGX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IEMGX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank
IEMGX
BEMIX
IEMGX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.82 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.14 | 3.53 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.56 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 4.01 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 16.28 | -5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.82 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.64 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.25 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMGX and BEMIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IEMGX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison
IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than BEMIX's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 5.75% | 6.01% | 4.66% | 1.99% | 4.22% | 19.49% | 3.91% | 2.69% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 1.53% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.03% | 2.15% | 3.04% | 2.45% | 2.86% | 2.31% | 1.31% | 2.56% | 1.55% | 1.41% | 2.20% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
IEMGX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum BEMIX drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMGX and BEMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -46.05% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.85% | -12.07% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.78% | -36.37% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.87% | -46.05% | +4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.53% | -9.61% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.24% | -14.32% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 2.97% | +1.19% |
Volatility
IEMGX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) at 9.06%. This indicates that IEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IEMGX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 9.06% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 12.81% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 17.53% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 16.20% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 16.98% | +1.03% |