PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 22.14% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 10.40%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


IEMG

1D
0.16%
1M
1.90%
YTD
22.14%
6M
22.65%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
10.40%

YCS

1D
0.39%
1M
3.97%
YTD
10.06%
6M
11.27%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
23.65%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
22.14%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
10.06%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and YCS is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.03

The correlation between IEMG and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

4.14

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

13.04

-1.86

IEMG vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-49.56%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-8.30%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-23.05%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-27.32%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-27.32%

-11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

0.00%

-5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-19.87%

+6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

2.63%

+0.99%

Volatility

IEMG vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.22%

2.25%

+9.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

11.91%

+8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.11%

16.93%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

21.10%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

18.82%

+1.37%

IEMG vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEMG vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.21%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and YCS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.66% vs 10.40% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.66% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer