IEMG vs. SLV
IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 10.40%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for SLV. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IEMG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 22.14% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -19.62% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 10.40%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 22.14%
- 6M
- 22.65%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
SLV
- 1D
- -7.09%
- 1M
- -24.25%
- YTD
- -19.62%
- 6M
- -20.61%
- 1Y
- 58.79%
- 3Y*
- 36.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
IEMG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 22.14% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -19.62% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and SLV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.31 |
The correlation between IEMG and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IEMG
SLV
IEMG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEMG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 1.16 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 2.66 | +8.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -76.28% | +37.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -50.97% | +37.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -50.97% | +33.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.75% | -50.97% | +15.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | -50.97% | +12.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -50.97% | +45.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -44.66% | +31.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 22.14% | -18.52% |
Volatility
IEMG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is 12.22%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that IEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.22% | 15.67% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.12% | 59.65% | -39.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.11% | 60.78% | -38.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 36.73% | -17.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 32.16% | -11.97% |
IEMG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEMG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.21% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEMG and SLV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to IEMG (12.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 11.85% vs 10.40% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 12.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SLV is Silver. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.50% for SLV.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEMG and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer