PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. IVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than IVLU's 11.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 8.77%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.


IEMG

1D
0.30%
1M
-9.83%
6M
9.74%
YTD
15.78%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
6.08%

IVLU

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.90%
6M
7.68%
YTD
11.76%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
15.78%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
11.76%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and IVLU is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.69

The correlation between IEMG and IVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMG vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMG
IVLU

Technology

43.6%
9.9%

Financial Services

17.3%
29.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
6.7%

Industrials

7.7%
17.4%

Basic Materials

5.8%
7.1%

Communication Services

5.6%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.2%
9.7%

Energy

3.0%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
5.9%

Utilities

1.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.4%

Technology

IEMG
43.6%
IVLU
9.9%

Financial Services

IEMG
17.3%
IVLU
29.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMG
7.7%
IVLU
6.7%

Industrials

IEMG
7.7%
IVLU
17.4%

Basic Materials

IEMG
5.8%
IVLU
7.1%

Communication Services

IEMG
5.6%
IVLU
3.5%

Healthcare

IEMG
3.2%
IVLU
9.7%

Energy

IEMG
3.0%
IVLU
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

IEMG
2.8%
IVLU
5.9%

Utilities

IEMG
1.9%
IVLU
3.6%

Real Estate

IEMG
1.5%
IVLU
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGIVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.83

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

10.70

-3.35

IEMG vs. IVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the IVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and IVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum IVLU drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and IVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGIVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-41.85%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-11.69%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-15.48%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-26.04%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-41.85%

+3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

-2.38%

-7.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-8.51%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.09%

+0.96%

Volatility

IEMG vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) at 3.99%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGIVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.61%

3.99%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

13.18%

+7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.06%

15.69%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

16.48%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

17.37%

+2.87%

IEMG vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEMG vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than IVLU's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.33%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.36%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and IVLU have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to IVLU (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs IVLU's -41.85%.

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.00% vs 8.77% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IVLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 2.33% for IEMG.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IVLU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and IVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer