PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. GSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. GSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than GSY's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has outperformed GSY with an annualized return of 10.42%, while GSY has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


IEMG

1D
0.61%
1M
0.34%
YTD
22.84%
6M
25.59%
1Y
44.83%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
10.42%

GSY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.96%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. GSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
22.84%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
1.72%4.96%5.95%5.99%0.01%0.03%1.88%3.39%2.18%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and GSY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.07

The correlation between IEMG and GSY shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. GSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GSY
GSY Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSY Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. GSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGGSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-24.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

6.54

-5.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

75.72

-72.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

373.96

-362.07

IEMG vs. GSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the GSY Sharpe Ratio of 11.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and GSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. GSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than GSY's maximum drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and GSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGGSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-12.14%

-26.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-0.06%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-0.18%

-17.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-1.48%

-34.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-5.25%

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

0.00%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-2.38%

-10.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

0.01%

+3.58%

Volatility

IEMG vs. GSY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) at 0.15%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGGSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

0.15%

+10.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.89%

0.31%

+18.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.08%

0.40%

+20.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

0.58%

+18.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

1.22%

+18.95%

IEMG vs. GSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GSY's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMG vs. GSY - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than GSY's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
4.34%4.56%5.31%4.95%1.70%0.58%1.45%2.71%2.30%1.80%1.21%1.17%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.24%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and GSY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to GSY (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs GSY's -12.14%.

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.42% vs 2.86% for GSY. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSY has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for GSY.

GSY has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 2.24% for IEMG.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while GSY is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.22% for GSY.

GSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.20 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and GSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer