PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSY vs. JPST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSY vs. JPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSY achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.95% return.


GSY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
1.85%
YTD
2.23%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
2.89%
ALL TIME*
1.96%

JPST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.05M$29.31M$31.19M
$275.20M$274.89M$316.70M

GSY vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
2.23%4.96%5.95%5.99%0.01%0.03%1.88%3.39%2.18%1.16%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.95%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GSY and JPST is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.41

The correlation between GSY and JPST shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSY vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSY
GSY Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSY Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSY vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSYJPSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.74

3.60

+2.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

72.77

27.70

+45.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

323.22

131.07

+192.14

GSY vs. JPST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSY Sharpe Ratio is 10.47, which is higher than the JPST Sharpe Ratio of 7.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSY and JPST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSY vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSY drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSY and JPST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSYJPSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-3.28%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-0.15%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.18%

-0.30%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.48%

-0.79%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-0.08%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.03%

-0.02%

Volatility

GSY vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) has a higher volatility of 0.14% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.13%. This indicates that GSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSYJPSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

0.13%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.32%

0.39%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42%

0.55%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.59%

0.58%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.22%

0.93%

+0.29%

GSY vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSY vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison

GSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, which matches JPST's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
4.26%4.56%5.31%4.95%1.70%0.58%1.45%2.71%2.30%1.80%1.21%1.17%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
3.85%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSY and JPST have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSY has higher volatility (0.14%) compared to JPST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSY dropped -12.14% vs JPST's -3.28%.

On 5-year performance, GSY leads with 3.77% vs 3.71% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSY has performed better with a 3.77% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for GSY.

GSY has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.85% for JPST.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for GSY and 0.18% for JPST.

GSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.47 vs 7.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSY and JPST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer