PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. ESGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. ESGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IEMG having a 26.21% return and ESGE slightly higher at 26.85%.


IEMG

1D
-1.34%
1M
7.97%
YTD
26.21%
6M
28.63%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.41%

ESGE

1D
-1.23%
1M
9.37%
YTD
26.85%
6M
29.21%
1Y
55.02%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. ESGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.21%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
ESGE
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
26.85%35.86%6.63%9.51%-22.41%-2.87%18.60%20.37%-15.24%38.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and ESGE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2016

0.96

The correlation between IEMG and ESGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMG vs. ESGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMG
ESGE

Technology

35.0%
43.4%

Financial Services

18.4%
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.3%

Industrials

9.0%
4.7%

Basic Materials

6.9%
4.1%

Communication Services

6.4%
7.2%

Energy

3.8%
2.2%

Healthcare

3.7%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.1%

Utilities

2.2%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.1%

Technology

IEMG
35.0%
ESGE
43.4%

Financial Services

IEMG
18.4%
ESGE
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMG
9.5%
ESGE
8.3%

Industrials

IEMG
9.0%
ESGE
4.7%

Basic Materials

IEMG
6.9%
ESGE
4.1%

Communication Services

IEMG
6.4%
ESGE
7.2%

Energy

IEMG
3.8%
ESGE
2.2%

Healthcare

IEMG
3.7%
ESGE
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

IEMG
3.3%
ESGE
2.1%

Utilities

IEMG
2.2%
ESGE
1.5%

Real Estate

IEMG
1.7%
ESGE
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. ESGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGE
ESGE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. ESGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMGESGEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

2.75

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

3.56

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.98

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.38

15.51

-0.13

IEMG vs. ESGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the ESGE Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and ESGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMGESGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.75

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.36

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.50

-0.14

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. ESGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum ESGE drawdown of -41.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and ESGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGESGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-41.07%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-13.90%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-16.71%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

-39.23%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.23%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-14.47%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.56%

-0.13%

Volatility

IEMG vs. ESGE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) have volatilities of 8.31% and 8.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGESGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

8.56%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

17.46%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

20.10%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.38%

19.11%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.03%

19.94%

+0.09%

IEMG vs. ESGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMG vs. ESGE - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than ESGE's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGE
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
1.97%2.50%2.41%2.64%2.68%2.66%1.31%2.59%2.19%1.86%0.27%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.18%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IEMG and ESGE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to IEMG (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs ESGE's -41.07%.

On 5-year performance, IEMG leads with 7.58% vs 6.83% for ESGE. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 7.58% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ESGE.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.97% for ESGE.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while ESGE is Emerging Markets Equities. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.25% for ESGE.

ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and ESGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer