ESGE vs. AVES
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES).
ESGE and AVES are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2016. AVES is an actively managed fund by American Century Investments. It was launched on Sep 28, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESGE or AVES.
Correlation
The correlation between ESGE and AVES is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
ESGE vs. AVES - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ESGE:
-0.14
AVES:
-0.52
ESGE:
-0.07
AVES:
-0.59
ESGE:
0.99
AVES:
0.92
ESGE:
-0.08
AVES:
-0.47
ESGE:
-0.45
AVES:
-1.37
ESGE:
5.41%
AVES:
6.33%
ESGE:
17.80%
AVES:
16.79%
ESGE:
-41.07%
AVES:
-27.40%
ESGE:
-27.62%
AVES:
-18.50%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGE achieves a -7.55% return, which is significantly higher than AVES's -9.05% return.
ESGE
-7.55%
-13.16%
-14.69%
-3.14%
4.01%
N/A
AVES
-9.05%
-12.20%
-16.52%
-9.43%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESGE vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ESGE vs. AVES — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ESGE
AVES
ESGE vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ESGE vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison
ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than AVES's 4.50% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 2.48% | 2.40% | 2.65% | 2.68% | 2.66% | 1.31% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 1.86% | 0.27% |
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 4.28% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ESGE vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGE drawdown since its inception was -41.07%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE and AVES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ESGE vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a higher volatility of 10.74% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) at 9.72%. This indicates that ESGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with ESGE or AVES
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
calculation of performance
Portfolio performance graph for past 1Y (thru 3/13/2025):
GLD=37.82%
IAU=37.97%
IAUM=38.34%
using daily adjusted closing market price (from NASDAQ) integrating the logarithmic daily rate of return between 3/13/2025 to 3/14/2025 to calculate the cumulative rate of return, I calculate
GLD=31.34%
IAU=31.45%
IAUM=31.66%
These ETF's do not pay a dividend, Expense cost is included in the closing price.
The difference in rate of return is about 6%, which is too large. I can send you my calculation (xls) if this would be useful.
What is causing the error?
Marcus Crahan
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca