IEMG vs. BNDX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and BNDX (Vanguard Total International Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while BNDX is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 9.88%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for BNDX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BNDX.

Performance

IEMG vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 9.88%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.65% annualized return.

IEMG

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

BNDX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 1.86%
• 3Y*: 4.01%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: 1.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	18.97%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF	0.37%	2.86%	3.57%	8.77%	-12.76%	-2.29%	4.65%	7.87%	2.81%	2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and BNDX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013	0.03

Over the past year, IEMG and BNDX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

IEMG vs. BNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEMG	BNDX
Technology	35.0%	-
Financial Services	18.4%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	-
Industrials	9.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	6.9%	-
Communication Services	6.4%	0.0%
Energy	3.8%	0.0%
Healthcare	3.7%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.2%	0.0%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.0%

Return for Risk

IEMG vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 67
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BNDX

BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 18
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMG	BNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	0.54	+1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	0.79	+1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.10	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	0.64	+2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	1.79	+9.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMG vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMG	BNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	0.54	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.05	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.41	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.60	-0.27

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and BNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMG	BNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-16.23%	-22.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	-2.93%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.21%	-2.93%	-14.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.75%	-15.86%	-19.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	-16.23%	-22.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.00%	-1.65%	-5.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.97%	-3.08%	-9.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	1.04%	+2.46%

Volatility

IEMG vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.47%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMG	BNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	1.47%	+8.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.35%	2.91%	+15.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.62%	3.43%	+17.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	4.88%	+13.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	4.09%	+16.05%

IEMG vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IEMG vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than BNDX's 4.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF	4.50%	4.39%	4.18%	4.42%	1.51%	3.74%	1.11%	3.40%	3.01%	2.23%	1.89%	1.63%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.31%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMG and BNDX in my portfolio?

IEMG and BNDX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEMG or BNDX?

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to BNDX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

Which ETF is better, IEMG or BNDX?

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 9.88% vs 1.65% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IEMG or BNDX?

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEMG or BNDX?

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IEMG or BNDX?

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 2.31% for IEMG.

What is the main difference between IEMG and BNDX?

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BNDX is Global Bonds. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.07% for BNDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.