IEMG vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 10.41%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

IEMG vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 10.41%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.

IEMG

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 26.21%
• 6M: 28.63%
• 1Y: 52.58%
• 3Y*: 23.55%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	26.21%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and ACWI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012	0.82

The correlation between IEMG and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMG vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEMG	ACWI
Technology	35.0%	29.4%
Financial Services	18.4%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.3%
Industrials	9.0%	10.9%
Basic Materials	6.9%	3.7%
Communication Services	6.4%	9.0%
Energy	3.8%	4.2%
Healthcare	3.7%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	5.0%
Utilities	2.2%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

IEMG vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 79
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMG	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.29	+0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	3.17	+0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.41	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	3.01	+0.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.38	13.53	+1.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMG vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMG	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	2.29	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.71	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.75	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.43	-0.07

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMG	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-56.00%	+17.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	-9.73%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.21%	-16.55%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.83%	-26.42%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	-33.53%	-5.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.83%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.97%	-8.61%	-4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.16%	+1.27%

Volatility

IEMG vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMG	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	3.93%	+4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.93%	10.29%	+6.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.43%	12.78%	+6.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.38%	16.05%	+2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.03%	17.11%	+2.92%

IEMG vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMG vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.18%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMG and ACWI in my portfolio?

IEMG and ACWI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEMG or ACWI?

IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, IEMG or ACWI?

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 10.41% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IEMG or ACWI?

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEMG or ACWI?

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IEMG or ACWI?

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between IEMG and ACWI?

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while ACWI is Global Equities. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.