PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEI vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEI vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEI achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IEI has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 1.16%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.


IEI

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.54%
6M
-0.62%
YTD
-0.62%
1Y
1.16%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
1.16%
ALL TIME*
2.82%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$154.98M$144.96M$146.28M

IEI vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEI
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.62%6.96%1.81%4.42%-9.51%-2.54%6.95%5.71%1.36%1.22%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IEI and BNO is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

-0.19

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IEI and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.19 to -0.42, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEI vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEI
IEI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEI vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEIBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.70

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

5.15

-3.25

IEI vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEI Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEI and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEI vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEI drawdown since its inception was -14.60%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEI and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEIBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-87.06%

+72.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-34.46%

+31.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

-34.46%

+30.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.82%

-34.46%

+20.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.60%

-75.18%

+60.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-16.21%

+14.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-39.99%

+37.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

11.86%

-10.77%

Volatility

IEI vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) is 0.77%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that IEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEIBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

17.47%

-16.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

40.96%

-38.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

44.54%

-41.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

36.41%

-31.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.93%

36.98%

-33.05%

IEI vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEI vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

IEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEI
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.38%3.48%3.18%2.36%1.37%0.73%1.12%2.01%1.95%1.51%1.33%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEI and BNO have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to IEI (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEI dropped -14.60% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 15.06% vs 1.16% for IEI. On fees, IEI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IEI has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 1.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

IEI has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

IEI is categorized as Government Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. IEI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IEI and 1.00% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEI and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer