IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

IEFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) and XRSG.L (Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFV.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while XRSG.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFV.L returned 11.12%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for XRSG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEFV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XRSG.L.

Performance

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFV.L achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly lower than XRSG.L's 19.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFV.L has outperformed XRSG.L with an annualized return of 11.12%, while XRSG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.

IEFV.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.90%
• 6M: 10.81%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 30.30%
• 3Y*: 19.93%
• 5Y*: 15.14%
• 10Y*: 11.12%
• ALL TIME*: 9.88%

XRSG.L

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.05%
• 6M: 12.42%
• YTD: 19.15%
• 1Y: 32.92%
• 3Y*: 13.88%
• 5Y*: 7.27%
• 10Y*: 10.00%
• ALL TIME*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEFV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF	12.29%	42.20%	5.40%	11.41%	1.47%	18.58%	-3.74%	15.71%	-12.67%	14.28%
XRSG.L Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C	19.15%	4.65%	11.80%	12.16%	-11.47%	15.43%	15.81%	20.64%	-7.63%	4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFV.L and XRSG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2015	0.62

The correlation between IEFV.L and XRSG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEFV.L	XRSG.L
Financial Services	25.3%	17.7%
Industrials	19.1%	14.1%
Healthcare	13.8%	20.3%
Technology	9.5%	14.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.4%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	9.2%
Basic Materials	5.1%	4.4%
Utilities	4.7%	2.7%
Energy	4.5%	5.4%
Communication Services	3.1%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.6%	6.7%

Return for Risk

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFV.L

IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

XRSG.L

XRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
XRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
XRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IEFV.L	XRSG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.95	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.69	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.33	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.81	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	10.93	-0.56

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFV.L and XRSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum XRSG.L drawdown of -48.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFV.L and XRSG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEFV.L	XRSG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-48.07%	+13.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.57%	-8.61%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.02%	-30.09%	+15.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.16%	-30.09%	+13.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.64%	-35.31%	+0.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-3.83%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-13.78%	+7.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	3.00%	-0.08%

Volatility

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEFV.L	XRSG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	4.40%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	12.15%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.76%	16.84%	-3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	23.62%	-6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.55%	22.54%	-4.99%

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XRSG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEFV.L vs. XRSG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFV.L nor XRSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEFV.L and XRSG.L in my portfolio?

IEFV.L and XRSG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IEFV.L or XRSG.L?

On fees, IEFV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEFV.L or XRSG.L?

IEFV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XRSG.L.

What is the main difference between IEFV.L and XRSG.L?

IEFV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XRSG.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while XRSG.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFV.L and 0.30% for XRSG.L.