IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L
IEFQ.L (iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - IEFQ.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEFQ.L returned 6.05%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEFQ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFQ.L achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.
IEFQ.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFQ.L iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS | 3.66% | 14.94% | -0.69% | 12.31% | -6.34% | 18.16% | 8.55% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFQ.L and PRUK.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IEFQ.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Technology
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Energy
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEFQ.L
PRUK.L
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEFQ.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.76 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 2.52 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEFQ.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.70 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.05 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.38 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFQ.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFQ.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.38% | -36.10% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -13.05% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | -18.00% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -36.10% | +18.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -3.76% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -14.80% | +10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.93% | -0.91% |
Volatility
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) is 3.63%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that IEFQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFQ.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.82% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 11.72% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 14.14% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.54% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 17.45% | -3.19% |
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEFQ.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
IEFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFQ.L iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFQ.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFQ.L.
IEFQ.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFQ.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for IEFQ.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer