IEFQ.L vs. CS51.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L).
IEFQ.L and CS51.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEFQ.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Jan 16, 2015. CS51.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both IEFQ.L and CS51.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IEFQ.L or CS51.L.
Performance
IEFQ.L vs. CS51.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFQ.L achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than CS51.L's 4.55% return.
IEFQ.L
-1.09%
-5.15%
-7.05%
3.75%
6.32%
N/A
CS51.L
4.55%
-3.39%
-7.12%
8.33%
7.76%
7.88%
Key characteristics
| IEFQ.L | CS51.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.33 | 0.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.55 | 0.95 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.06 | 1.11 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.40 | 0.85 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.21 | 2.06 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.80% | 4.02% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.12% | 13.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.38% | -33.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.12% | -7.74% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEFQ.L vs. CS51.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CS51.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IEFQ.L and CS51.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IEFQ.L vs. CS51.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IEFQ.L vs. CS51.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEFQ.L nor CS51.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IEFQ.L vs. CS51.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, smaller than the maximum CS51.L drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFQ.L and CS51.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IEFQ.L vs. CS51.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) is 4.73%, while iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that IEFQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CS51.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.