PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFM.L is traded in GBp, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFM.L achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFM.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 12.41%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.


IEFM.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.92%
6M
10.23%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
12.41%

IGLN.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.55%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
27.94%
5Y*
19.72%
10Y*
14.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
6.92%33.05%15.03%10.37%-9.80%14.07%17.04%23.39%-9.90%16.64%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
4.12%53.17%28.35%7.77%11.79%-3.12%20.51%13.78%4.54%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFM.L and IGLN.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.10

The correlation between IEFM.L and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFM.L
IEFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFM.LIGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.86

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

4.95

-1.40

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFM.L and IGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFM.LIGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.35

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.17

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.87

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.52

+0.16

Drawdowns

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -41.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFM.L and IGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFM.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-41.86%

+17.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-17.53%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-17.53%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-17.53%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

-22.37%

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-16.35%

+14.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-14.94%

+9.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

6.59%

-0.80%

Volatility

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) is 3.99%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that IEFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFM.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

5.98%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

21.12%

-7.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

24.08%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

16.81%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.35%

+0.68%

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEFM.L and IGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFM.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFM.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFM.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFM.L and IGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IEFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while IGLN.L is Gold. IEFM.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFM.L and IGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer