IEF vs. SCHR
IEF (iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IEF tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index while SCHR tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEF returned 0.63%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for SCHR. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IEF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SCHR.
Performance
IEF vs. SCHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEF achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than SCHR's -0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IEF has underperformed SCHR with an annualized return of 0.63%, while SCHR has yielded a comparatively higher 1.23% annualized return.
IEF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- -1.14%
- 10Y*
- 0.63%
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
IEF vs. SCHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.66% | 8.03% | -0.63% | 3.64% | -15.15% | -3.33% | 10.01% | 8.03% | 0.99% | 2.55% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 7.33% | 1.42% | 4.27% | -10.58% | -2.62% | 7.72% | 6.18% | 1.46% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEF and SCHR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IEF and SCHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEF vs. SCHR — Risk / Return Rank
IEF
SCHR
IEF vs. SCHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEF | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.04 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.57 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | 3.82 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEF | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.04 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.01 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.28 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
IEF vs. SCHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEF drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, which is greater than SCHR's maximum drawdown of -16.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEF and SCHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEF | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -16.11% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.07% | -2.79% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.74% | -4.35% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -15.07% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.93% | -16.11% | -7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -2.37% | -8.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -3.64% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 0.93% | +0.44% |
Volatility
IEF vs. SCHR - Volatility Comparison
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) at 1.08%. This indicates that IEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEF | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.08% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.34% | 2.35% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78% | 3.43% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 5.38% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.62% | 4.47% | +2.15% |
IEF vs. SCHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEF vs. SCHR - Dividend Comparison
IEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, which matches SCHR's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.90% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.91% | 1.96% | 0.83% | 1.08% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 1.82% | 1.81% | 1.90% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IEF and SCHR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEF has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to SCHR (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEF dropped -23.93% vs SCHR's -16.11%.
On 10-year performance, SCHR leads with 1.23% vs 0.63% for IEF. On fees, SCHR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHR has performed better with a 1.23% return vs 0.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IEF.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 3.90% for IEF.
IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IEF and 0.05% for SCHR.
SCHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEF and SCHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer