PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEF vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEF vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEF achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IEF has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 0.53%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


IEF

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
0.53%

JNJ

1D
-0.26%
1M
5.50%
YTD
13.43%
6M
16.43%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEF vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-1.16%8.03%-0.63%3.64%-15.15%-3.33%10.01%8.03%0.99%2.55%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
13.43%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IEF and JNJ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2002

-0.12

The correlation between IEF and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEF vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEF vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.57

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

4.91

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

14.52

-11.73

IEF vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEF and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFJNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

3.19

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.60

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.55

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.54

-0.04

Drawdowns

IEF vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEF drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEF and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.93%

-50.67%

+26.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-10.96%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.74%

-15.95%

+8.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.40%

-18.41%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

-27.37%

+3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.80%

-6.06%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-11.88%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

3.70%

-2.30%

Volatility

IEF vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) is 1.51%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that IEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

5.80%

-4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.36%

12.41%

-9.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69%

16.87%

-12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.71%

16.87%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.63%

18.47%

-11.84%

Dividends

IEF vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

IEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than JNJ's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.92%3.77%3.62%2.91%1.96%0.83%1.08%2.08%2.24%1.82%1.81%1.90%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.26%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEF and JNJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to IEF (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEF dropped -23.93% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEF and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer