PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IEDL.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IEDL.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - IEDL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEDL.L returned 14.48%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEDL.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEDL.L is traded in EUR, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEDL.L achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 16.63% return.

IEDL.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.00%
YTD
14.13%
6M
18.09%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
—

CMU.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
7.45%
YTD
16.63%
6M
18.50%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
9.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		14.13%35.00%10.46%13.50%-3.75%26.71%-8.76%21.78%-12.14%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		16.63%19.15%6.31%16.82%-10.18%20.38%-1.09%26.84%-12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IEDL.L and CMU.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.87

The correlation between IEDL.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IEDL.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

22.6%
21.8%

Industrials

17.0%
15.7%

Healthcare

12.3%
4.2%

Technology

12.2%
30.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
5.2%

Basic Materials

6.2%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
10.1%

Energy

5.1%
0.0%

Utilities

4.5%
5.8%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.3%

Financial Services

IEDL.L
22.6%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

IEDL.L
17.0%
CMU.L
15.7%

Healthcare

IEDL.L
12.3%
CMU.L
4.2%

Technology

IEDL.L
12.2%
CMU.L
30.8%

Consumer Defensive

IEDL.L
8.6%
CMU.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

IEDL.L
6.2%
CMU.L
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IEDL.L
6.2%
CMU.L
10.1%

Energy

IEDL.L
5.1%
CMU.L
0.0%

Utilities

IEDL.L
4.5%
CMU.L
5.8%

Communication Services

IEDL.L
3.7%
CMU.L
2.3%

Real Estate

IEDL.L
0.6%
CMU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select

Often compared with IEDL.L:
IEDL.L vs. S7XP.LIEDL.L vs. XHYG.DEIEDL.L vs. MVEW.DEIEDL.L vs. T3KE.DEIEDL.L vs. EUMD.LIEDL.L vs. CNX1.LIEDL.L vs. VEUR.L
Often compared with CMU.L:
CMU.L vs. CEUR.LCMU.L vs. GLDCMU.L vs. UB06.LCMU.L vs. FLXD.LCMU.L vs. 500U.LCMU.L vs. BNKE.LCMU.L vs. 100D.L

Return for Risk

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IEDL.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.44
1.75

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.32
2.55

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.49

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

9.30

+3.42

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEDL.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IEDL.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.75

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.64

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.57

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.49

+0.10

Drawdowns

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEDL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -38.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEDL.L and CMU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IEDL.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-38.75%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-10.61%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-14.04%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.57%

-23.95%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-38.75%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.55%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-6.34%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.84%

-0.23%

Volatility

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) is 4.83%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that IEDL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IEDL.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

5.42%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

12.37%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

15.05%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

16.07%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

17.21%

+0.76%

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEDL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IEDL.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

IEDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

IEDL.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEDL.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEDL.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer