PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEBC.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEBC.L achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than ISXF.L's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, IEBC.L has outperformed ISXF.L with an annualized return of 2.30%, while ISXF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.39% annualized return.


IEBC.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.06%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
2.30%

ISXF.L

1D
0.33%
1M
2.17%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
-1.41%
10Y*
1.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEBC.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.13%9.43%-0.07%5.85%-8.39%-7.87%8.96%1.12%-0.45%5.98%
ISXF.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF
-0.58%6.93%-0.18%8.72%-19.96%-4.01%8.54%11.27%-2.05%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IEBC.L and ISXF.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.35

The correlation between IEBC.L and ISXF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEBC.L
IEBC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IEBC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

ISXF.L
ISXF.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ISXF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEBC.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEBC.LISXF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.97

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

2.74

+0.80

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEBC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the ISXF.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEBC.L and ISXF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEBC.LISXF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.79

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

-0.18

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.19

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.10

Drawdowns

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEBC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.31%, smaller than the maximum ISXF.L drawdown of -32.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEBC.L and ISXF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEBC.LISXF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.31%

-32.38%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-4.73%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.92%

-4.73%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.80%

-31.23%

+14.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.31%

-32.38%

+11.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-11.65%

+7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-6.57%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.67%

-0.16%

Volatility

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEBC.L) is 1.37%, while iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that IEBC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISXF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEBC.LISXF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.43%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.62%

5.10%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

5.77%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

7.92%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

7.28%

+0.37%

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEBC.L and ISXF.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEBC.L vs. ISXF.L - Dividend Comparison

IEBC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than ISXF.L's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEBC.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.85%3.76%4.10%2.89%0.94%0.97%0.93%1.30%1.09%1.72%1.94%1.22%
ISXF.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF
4.54%4.23%3.97%3.15%2.93%2.31%2.30%2.66%2.87%2.87%3.48%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEBC.L and ISXF.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEBC.L and ISXF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IEBC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while ISXF.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEBC.L and ISXF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer