PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEBC.L) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEBC.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.82%8.80%-0.68%5.43%-8.52%-7.98%8.83%0.98%-0.58%1.35%
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.25%8.62%-0.44%5.36%-8.93%-6.97%8.50%0.21%-0.51%1.42%
Different Trading Currencies

IEBC.L is traded in GBP, while IEAA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEAA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEBC.L achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than IEAA.L's -0.25% return.


IEBC.L

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
1.82%

IEAA.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
0.23%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEBC.L and IEAA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEBC.L
IEBC.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IEBC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEBC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IEAA.L
IEAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEBC.L) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEBC.LIEAA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.97

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.97

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.13

5.64

-0.51

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEBC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEBC.L and IEAA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEBC.LIEAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.05

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.09

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between IEBC.L and IEAA.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Dividend Comparison

IEBC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, while IEAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEBC.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.62%3.21%3.49%2.51%0.79%0.84%0.82%1.15%0.97%1.51%1.53%0.87%
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEBC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, roughly equal to the maximum IEAA.L drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEBC.L and IEAA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IEBC.LIEAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.51%

-17.29%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-2.73%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.92%

-17.29%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-2.20%

-4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-4.62%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.61%

+0.68%

Volatility

IEBC.L vs. IEAA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEBC.L) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) have volatilities of 2.09% and 2.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IEBC.LIEAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

2.04%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

3.55%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14%

5.42%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

6.35%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.74%

6.94%

+0.80%