IEAC.AS vs. CNYA
IEAC.AS (iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF) and CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEAC.AS is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while CNYA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.AS returned 0.63%/yr vs 4.72%/yr for CNYA. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEAC.AS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNYA.
Performance
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEAC.AS is traded in EUR, while CNYA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNYA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEAC.AS achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.AS has underperformed CNYA with an annualized return of 0.63%, while CNYA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.72% annualized return.
IEAC.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- -0.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 0.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.92%
CNYA
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- -1.69%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.42%
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF | -1.20% | 3.05% | 4.40% | 7.74% | -13.63% | -1.02% | 2.55% | 6.29% | -1.52% | 2.20% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 3.95% | 11.47% | 18.10% | -16.34% | -21.96% | 11.28% | 29.87% | 39.02% | -23.11% | 14.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEAC.AS and CNYA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016 | 0.06 |
The correlation between IEAC.AS and CNYA shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
IEAC.AS
CNYA
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEAC.AS | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.07 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 7.11 | -7.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEAC.AS drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum CNYA drawdown of -43.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAC.AS and CNYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEAC.AS | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -43.64% | +26.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | -10.47% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.65% | -32.98% | +30.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -42.08% | +24.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.26% | -43.64% | +26.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -15.60% | +12.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -16.11% | +13.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 3.05% | -2.23% |
Volatility
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) is 1.88%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 9.10%. This indicates that IEAC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEAC.AS | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 9.10% | -7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.24% | 14.67% | -11.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 19.31% | -15.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.51% | 23.21% | -18.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 23.32% | -18.94% |
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEAC.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEAC.AS vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
IEAC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than CNYA's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 1.74% | 3.29% | 3.39% | 2.51% | 0.84% | 0.81% | 0.84% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.52% | 1.66% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEAC.AS and CNYA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEAC.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEAC.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.
IEAC.AS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CNYA is China Equities. IEAC.AS tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEAC.AS and 0.60% for CNYA.
Find the right allocation for IEAC.AS and CNYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer