IDX vs. MOAT
IDX (VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MVIS Indonesia Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDX returned -3.79%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for MOAT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
IDX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -34.83% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of -3.79%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.
IDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -34.83%
- 6M
- -35.84%
- 1Y
- -21.80%
- 3Y*
- -12.82%
- 5Y*
- -7.49%
- 10Y*
- -3.79%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- 12.04%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
IDX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | -34.83% | 13.83% | -9.75% | 1.98% | -9.40% | -2.59% | -7.45% | 6.26% | -10.46% | 19.24% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -2.39% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDX and MOAT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.47 |
The correlation between IDX and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDX vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDX
MOAT
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
IDX
MOAT
Basic Materials
IDX
MOAT
-
Consumer Defensive
IDX
MOAT
Communication Services
IDX
MOAT
Energy
IDX
MOAT
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDX
MOAT
Utilities
IDX
MOAT
-
Technology
IDX
MOAT
Healthcare
IDX
MOAT
Real Estate
IDX
MOAT
Industrials
IDX
MOAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
IDX
MOAT
IDX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.15 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 0.97 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 2.92 | -4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -33.31% | -29.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.52% | -12.43% | -32.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.73% | -21.44% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.25% | -23.96% | -27.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.11% | -33.31% | -25.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.80% | -6.12% | -49.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -3.83% | -21.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.47% | 4.13% | +11.34% |
Volatility
IDX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.72%. This indicates that IDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 4.72% | +8.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.92% | 10.23% | +14.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.38% | 13.99% | +13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 18.24% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 18.65% | +5.82% |
IDX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than MOAT's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | 3.20% | 2.08% | 4.01% | 3.62% | 3.64% | 1.08% | 1.66% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.16% | 2.43% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.39% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDX has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to MOAT (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.64% vs -3.79% for IDX. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.64% return vs -3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for IDX.
IDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.39% for MOAT.
IDX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDX and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer