IDX vs. FPA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IDX (VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF) and FPA (First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IDX tracks the MVIS Indonesia Index while FPA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDX returned -4.45%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for FPA. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FPA.

Performance

IDX vs. FPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly lower than FPA's 49.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed FPA with an annualized return of -4.45%, while FPA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.

IDX

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -21.09%
• YTD: -36.77%
• 6M: -37.78%
• 1Y: -27.09%
• 3Y*: -14.02%
• 5Y*: -9.23%
• 10Y*: -4.45%

FPA

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 49.31%
• 6M: 48.83%
• 1Y: 76.39%
• 3Y*: 32.24%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 10.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDX vs. FPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF	-36.77%	13.83%	-9.75%	1.98%	-9.40%	-2.59%	-7.45%	6.26%	-10.46%	19.24%
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	49.31%	43.16%	3.95%	9.97%	-14.55%	2.98%	13.43%	8.91%	-21.91%	35.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IDX and FPA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011	0.48

The correlation between IDX and FPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDX vs. FPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDX	FPA
Basic Materials	25.2%	4.9%
Financial Services	25.1%	9.6%
Energy	12.5%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	9.0%	3.2%
Communication Services	8.9%	2.6%
Industrials	7.4%	37.1%
Utilities	5.2%	5.7%
Technology	2.6%	16.1%
Healthcare	1.8%	1.0%
Real Estate	1.8%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	8.8%

Return for Risk

IDX vs. FPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDX

IDX Risk / Return Rank: 1
IDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
IDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IDX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

FPA

FPA Risk / Return Rank: 86
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDX vs. FPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDX	FPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.08	3.01	-4.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	3.71	-5.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.50	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	5.00	-5.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.07	18.44	-20.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDX vs. FPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDX Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the FPA Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDX and FPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDX	FPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.08	3.01	-4.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	0.53	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18	0.49	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.33	-0.19

Drawdowns

IDX vs. FPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than FPA's maximum drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and FPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDX	FPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.14%	-52.91%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.41%	-15.37%	-24.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.82%	-20.66%	-21.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.77%	-35.21%	-11.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.11%	-52.91%	-6.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.11%	-5.49%	-51.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.83%	-13.48%	-11.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.07%	4.16%	+8.91%

Volatility

IDX vs. FPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) is 8.31%, while First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that IDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDX	FPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	12.88%	-4.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.03%	21.98%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.08%	25.60%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	23.99%	-3.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.31%	22.39%	+1.92%

IDX vs. FPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FPA's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDX vs. FPA - Dividend Comparison

IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FPA's 3.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	3.57%	4.71%	3.40%	3.02%	4.22%	5.12%	1.59%	3.90%	2.81%	3.15%	2.42%	1.74%
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF	3.29%	2.08%	4.01%	3.62%	3.64%	1.08%	1.66%	2.21%	2.19%	1.85%	1.16%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDX and FPA in my portfolio?

IDX and FPA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDX or FPA?

FPA has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to IDX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs FPA's -52.91%.

Which ETF is better, IDX or FPA?

On 10-year performance, FPA leads with 10.95% vs -4.45% for IDX. On fees, IDX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, IDX has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDX or FPA?

Over the 10-year period, FPA has performed better with a 10.95% return vs -4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDX or FPA?

IDX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDX or FPA?

FPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 3.29% for IDX.

What is the main difference between IDX and FPA?

IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.80% for FPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.