IDWP.L vs. XREP.L
IDWP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS) and XREP.L (Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP) are both REIT funds - IDWP.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while XREP.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDWP.L returned 8.57%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for XREP.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDWP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XREP.L.
Performance
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDWP.L is traded in USD, while XREP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XREP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDWP.L achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than XREP.L's 9.03% return.
IDWP.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.24%
XREP.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 9.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDWP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS | 6.84% | 9.19% | 0.18% | 9.37% | 7.26% |
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 9.03% | 4.22% | 2.34% | 12.23% | 7.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDWP.L and XREP.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IDWP.L and XREP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDWP.L
XREP.L
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IDWP.L
XREP.L
Financial Services
IDWP.L
XREP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDWP.L
XREP.L
-
Basic Materials
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Communication Services
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Energy
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Healthcare
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Industrials
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Technology
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Utilities
IDWP.L
-
XREP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDWP.L
XREP.L
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS (IDWP.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDWP.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 0.32 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 0.48 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDWP.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.21 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.35 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDWP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.51%, which is greater than XREP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDWP.L and XREP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDWP.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.51% | -28.63% | -41.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -28.63% | +18.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -28.63% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -20.87% | +16.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.58% | -9.73% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 19.33% | -16.44% |
Volatility
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS (IDWP.L) is 3.63%, while Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that IDWP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XREP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDWP.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.27% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 9.75% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 44.18% | -32.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 28.34% | -12.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 28.34% | -11.11% |
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDWP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XREP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDWP.L vs. XREP.L - Dividend Comparison
IDWP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while XREP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDWP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS | 3.01% | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.07% | 3.66% | 2.22% | 2.91% | 2.89% | 3.94% | 2.91% | 3.27% | 3.01% |
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDWP.L and XREP.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XREP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XREP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IDWP.L.
IDWP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while XREP.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IDWP.L and 0.14% for XREP.L.
Find the right allocation for IDWP.L and XREP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer