IDVZ vs. DBO
IDVZ (Opal International Dividend Income ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IDVZ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. IDVZ is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, IDVZ returned 22.54% vs 80.26% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. IDVZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
IDVZ vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDVZ achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
IDVZ
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
IDVZ vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IDVZ Opal International Dividend Income ETF | 9.70% | 33.14% | -1.61% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDVZ and DBO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDVZ vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
IDVZ
DBO
IDVZ vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDVZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.44 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 9.02 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDVZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.34 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 0.02 | +2.00 |
Drawdowns
IDVZ vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDVZ drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVZ and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDVZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -90.18% | +79.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -18.19% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -51.38% | +48.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -62.25% | +60.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 8.92% | -6.59% |
Volatility
IDVZ vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) is 3.88%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that IDVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDVZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 12.61% | -8.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 28.20% | -18.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 34.46% | -22.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 32.29% | -17.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 31.78% | -17.30% |
IDVZ vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDVZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDVZ vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
IDVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
IDVZ Opal International Dividend Income ETF | 2.76% | 2.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDVZ and DBO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to IDVZ (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVZ dropped -10.99% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 80.26% vs 22.54% for IDVZ. On fees, IDVZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, IDVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 80.26% return vs 22.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDVZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
IDVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
IDVZ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IDVZ and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDVZ and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer