IDVO vs. SILJ
IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. IDVO is actively managed, while SILJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDVO returned 23.82%/yr vs 47.77%/yr for SILJ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
IDVO vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's 6.61% return.
IDVO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 6M
- 14.66%
- 1Y
- 35.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
IDVO vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 14.12% | 36.46% | 10.16% | 17.53% | 5.47% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | 14.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDVO and SILJ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between IDVO and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDVO vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDVO
SILJ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
IDVO
SILJ
Basic Materials
IDVO
SILJ
Energy
IDVO
SILJ
-
Industrials
IDVO
SILJ
-
Communication Services
IDVO
SILJ
Technology
IDVO
SILJ
-
Healthcare
IDVO
SILJ
-
Consumer Defensive
IDVO
SILJ
Utilities
IDVO
SILJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDVO
SILJ
-
Real Estate
IDVO
-
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDVO vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
IDVO
SILJ
IDVO vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDVO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 3.24 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.25 | 7.99 | +5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDVO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.05 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.09 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
IDVO vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDVO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.46% | -79.04% | +63.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -34.71% | +24.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | -34.71% | +19.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -26.80% | +25.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -41.43% | +39.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 14.06% | -11.39% |
Volatility
IDVO vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) is 5.20%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that IDVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDVO | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 18.69% | -13.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 45.24% | -32.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 54.90% | -39.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 44.35% | -27.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 46.24% | -29.88% |
IDVO vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDVO vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than SILJ's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.48% | 5.42% | 6.14% | 5.72% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDVO and SILJ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to IDVO (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVO dropped -15.46% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 3-year performance, SILJ leads with 47.77% vs 23.82% for IDVO. On fees, IDVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IDVO has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 47.77% return vs 23.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.
IDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SILJ is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.69% for SILJ.
IDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDVO and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer