PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDVO vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDVO vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.


IDVO

1D
-1.25%
1M
2.08%
YTD
14.12%
6M
14.66%
1Y
35.28%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.79%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVO vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDVO and RBIL is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDVO vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVO
IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVO vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDVORBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

2.39

-0.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

17.00

-13.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.25

70.66

-57.41

IDVO vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVO and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDVORBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

5.01

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

4.28

-2.90

Drawdowns

IDVO vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVORBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.46%

-0.50%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-0.27%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

0.00%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-0.06%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

0.07%

+2.60%

Volatility

IDVO vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that IDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDVORBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

0.30%

+4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

0.79%

+12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

0.92%

+14.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

1.05%

+15.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

1.05%

+15.31%

IDVO vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDVO vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.48%5.42%6.14%5.72%1.96%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.60%3.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDVO and RBIL have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDVO has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVO dropped -15.46% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

On 1-year performance, IDVO leads with 35.28% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDVO has performed better with a 35.28% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDVO.

IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.

IDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDVO and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer