IDVO vs. 2807.HK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and 2807.HK (Global X China Robotics and AI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while 2807.HK is a China Equities fund tracking the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. IDVO is actively managed, while 2807.HK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDVO returned 20.92%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for 2807.HK. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for 2807.HK.

Performance

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IDVO is traded in USD, while 2807.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2807.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than 2807.HK's -9.72% return.

IDVO

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -0.99%
• 6M: 4.02%
• YTD: 12.22%
• 1Y: 30.16%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.32%

2807.HK

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -19.19%
• 6M: -20.42%
• YTD: -9.72%
• 1Y: 10.58%
• 3Y*: 1.48%
• 5Y*: -5.01%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	12.22%	36.46%	10.16%	17.53%	6.42%
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	-9.72%	23.25%	6.21%	1.73%	-7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVO and 2807.HK is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022	0.16

Return for Risk

IDVO vs. 2807.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVO

IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 76
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 17
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDVO	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	0.34	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	0.67	+1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.08	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	0.50	+2.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	1.09	+9.65

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVO and 2807.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, smaller than the maximum 2807.HK drawdown of -52.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and 2807.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDVO	2807.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.46%	-52.15%	+36.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-21.87%	+11.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.46%	-34.56%	+19.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-28.27%	+25.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-27.10%	+24.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	9.81%	-7.00%

Volatility

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) is 3.51%, while Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that IDVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2807.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDVO	2807.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	14.05%	-10.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.81%	24.69%	-10.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.45%	32.33%	-15.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.40%	33.19%	-16.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.40%	33.51%	-17.11%

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than 2807.HK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDVO vs. 2807.HK - Dividend Comparison

IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, while 2807.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	5.69%	5.42%	6.14%	5.72%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDVO and 2807.HK in my portfolio?

IDVO and 2807.HK have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IDVO or 2807.HK?

On fees, IDVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDVO or 2807.HK?

IDVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for 2807.HK.

What is the main difference between IDVO and 2807.HK?

IDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while 2807.HK is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.68% for 2807.HK.