IDV vs. IXC
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.92%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for IXC. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
IDV vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 29.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 10.92%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 36.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
IDV vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.17% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and IXC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IDV and IXC has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IDV vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
IXC
Financial Services
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
IDV
IXC
-
Energy
IDV
IXC
Utilities
IDV
IXC
-
Communication Services
IDV
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
IDV
IXC
-
Industrials
IDV
IXC
-
Basic Materials
IDV
IXC
-
Real Estate
IDV
IXC
-
Technology
IDV
IXC
-
Healthcare
IDV
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
IXC
IDV vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 4.05 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 11.55 | +3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, roughly equal to the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -67.88% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -9.66% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -19.06% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -24.93% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -64.16% | +21.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -7.04% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -17.47% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 3.38% | -1.08% |
Volatility
IDV vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is 4.24%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 6.44% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 15.63% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 18.79% | -5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 23.53% | -7.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 26.84% | -8.92% |
IDV vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than IXC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and IXC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to IDV (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.92% vs 10.05% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.92% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.85% for IXC.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.40% for IXC.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer