IDV vs. FYLD
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IDV is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.28%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for FYLD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
IDV vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 18.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 10.28%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.
IDV
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 36.98%
- 3Y*
- 25.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 39.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
IDV vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 12.32% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 18.51% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and FYLD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IDV and FYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDV vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
FYLD
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
IDV
FYLD
Energy
IDV
FYLD
Utilities
IDV
FYLD
Communication Services
IDV
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
IDV
FYLD
Industrials
IDV
FYLD
Basic Materials
IDV
FYLD
Real Estate
IDV
FYLD
-
Technology
IDV
FYLD
Healthcare
IDV
-
FYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
FYLD
IDV vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDV | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.62 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 7.35 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 26.30 | -9.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDV | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | 3.48 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.71 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.45 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
IDV vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than FYLD's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -44.55% | -25.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -5.44% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -15.15% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -25.12% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -44.55% | +2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -1.54% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.40% | -8.83% | -6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.52% | +0.70% |
Volatility
IDV vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 3.00%. This indicates that IDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.00% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 8.78% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 11.50% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 16.23% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 18.03% | -0.09% |
IDV vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than FYLD's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.65% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.45% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and FYLD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDV has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FYLD (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.35% vs 10.28% for IDV. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 3.65% for FYLD.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer