IDV vs. EWY
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.92%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for EWY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
IDV vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 10.92%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.84% annualized return.
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
IDV vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and EWY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IDV and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDV vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
EWY
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
IDV
EWY
Energy
IDV
EWY
Utilities
IDV
EWY
Communication Services
IDV
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
EWY
Consumer Defensive
IDV
EWY
Industrials
IDV
EWY
Basic Materials
IDV
EWY
Real Estate
IDV
EWY
-
Technology
IDV
EWY
Healthcare
IDV
-
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
EWY
IDV vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 8.65 | -4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 30.24 | -14.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -74.14% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -23.08% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -27.36% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -48.55% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -49.73% | +7.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -8.88% | +7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -20.11% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 6.59% | -4.29% |
Volatility
IDV vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is 4.24%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 25.64% | -21.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 42.65% | -31.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 46.51% | -33.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 30.15% | -14.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 28.06% | -10.14% |
IDV vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than EWY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and EWY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to IDV (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 10.92% for IDV. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.59% for EWY.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer