IDV vs. EMXC
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDV returned 12.17%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for EMXC. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
IDV vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
EMXC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 37.25%
- 6M
- 42.23%
- 1Y
- 65.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- —
IDV vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 3.08% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 37.25% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and EMXC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IDV and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDV vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
EMXC
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
IDV
EMXC
Energy
IDV
EMXC
Utilities
IDV
EMXC
Communication Services
IDV
EMXC
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
EMXC
Consumer Defensive
IDV
EMXC
Industrials
IDV
EMXC
Basic Materials
IDV
EMXC
Real Estate
IDV
EMXC
Technology
IDV
EMXC
Healthcare
IDV
-
EMXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
EMXC
IDV vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.50 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 4.55 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 17.51 | -2.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -42.81% | -27.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -14.41% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -19.12% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -28.91% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -4.12% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -10.17% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 3.74% | -1.44% |
Volatility
IDV vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is 4.24%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 12.83% | -8.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 21.90% | -11.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 23.90% | -10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 18.00% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 20.07% | -2.15% |
IDV vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IDV and EMXC have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
IDV vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than EMXC's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.05% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and EMXC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to IDV (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 5-year performance, IDV leads with 12.17% vs 12.14% for EMXC. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDV has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV and EMXC have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.05% for EMXC.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer