PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDUP.L vs. XREP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDUP.L is traded in USD, while XREP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XREP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDUP.L achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than XREP.L's 11.87% return.


IDUP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.06%
6M
14.44%
YTD
16.04%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
9.47%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
4.11%

XREP.L

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.09%
6M
10.85%
YTD
11.87%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IDUP.L
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
16.04%2.23%4.73%13.04%-10.12%
XREP.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP
11.87%4.22%2.34%12.23%-10.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IDUP.L and XREP.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2022

0.89

The correlation between IDUP.L and XREP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDUP.L
IDUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XREP.L
XREP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XREP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XREP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XREP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XREP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XREP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDUP.LXREP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.16

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.52

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

4.13

+2.69

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the XREP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDUP.L and XREP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDUP.L drawdown since its inception was -75.24%, which is greater than XREP.L's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDUP.L and XREP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDUP.LXREP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.24%

-26.77%

-48.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-7.95%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.33%

-17.80%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.77%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-9.60%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.94%

-0.24%

Volatility

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) is 3.92%, while Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that IDUP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XREP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDUP.LXREP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.48%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

10.53%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

13.53%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

18.12%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.35%

18.12%

+2.23%

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDUP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XREP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDUP.L vs. XREP.L - Dividend Comparison

IDUP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while XREP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDUP.L
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.90%3.20%3.09%3.13%3.84%2.13%3.22%3.10%4.60%3.17%3.55%2.98%
XREP.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDUP.L and XREP.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XREP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XREP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDUP.L.

IDUP.L tracks iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while XREP.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDUP.L and 0.14% for XREP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDUP.L and XREP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer