IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L
IDTW.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FOOD.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IDTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD), while FOOD.L is a Agriculture Equities fund tracking the Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDTW.L returned 18.84%/yr vs -8.78%/yr for FOOD.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDTW.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FOOD.L.
Performance
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTW.L achieves a 51.77% return, which is significantly higher than FOOD.L's 5.69% return.
IDTW.L
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- -10.58%
- 6M
- 42.72%
- YTD
- 51.77%
- 1Y
- 73.35%
- 3Y*
- 37.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.92%
FOOD.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- -2.01%
- 3Y*
- -3.87%
- 5Y*
- -8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 51.77% | 31.78% | 23.61% | 28.84% | -29.55% | 28.51% | 20.13% |
FOOD.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) | 5.69% | -2.89% | -7.32% | -1.58% | -26.82% | 1.07% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTW.L and FOOD.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between IDTW.L and FOOD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTW.L
FOOD.L
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FOOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDTW.L | FOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.99 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.05 | -0.12 | +5.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.48 | -0.23 | +16.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTW.L drawdown since its inception was -60.07%, which is greater than FOOD.L's maximum drawdown of -47.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTW.L and FOOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTW.L | FOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.07% | -47.70% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -16.06% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.24% | -24.15% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.98% | -47.70% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.46% | -39.29% | +24.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -28.63% | +16.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 8.64% | -4.20% |
Volatility
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FOOD.L) at 4.89%. This indicates that IDTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTW.L | FOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.06% | 4.89% | +7.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.76% | 12.24% | +12.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.27% | 15.84% | +12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 18.72% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 18.21% | +4.20% |
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTW.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FOOD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDTW.L vs. FOOD.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while FOOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOOD.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.99% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 2.09% | 3.39% | 1.35% | 1.73% | 2.15% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 3.10% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTW.L and FOOD.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOOD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOOD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.
IDTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FOOD.L is Agriculture Equities. IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD), while FOOD.L tracks Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IDTW.L and 0.45% for FOOD.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTW.L and FOOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer