FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FOOD.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and MKUW.L (Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - FOOD.L tracks the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD while MKUW.L tracks the Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOOD.L returned -9.02%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for MKUW.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FOOD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MKUW.L.

Performance

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) and Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOOD.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than MKUW.L's 0.89% return.

FOOD.L

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.57%
• 6M: -0.79%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 1Y: -3.28%
• 3Y*: -3.92%
• 5Y*: -9.02%
• 10Y*: —

MKUW.L

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -1.83%
• 6M: 1.55%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FOOD.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD	4.32%	-2.89%	-7.32%	-1.58%	-26.82%	1.07%	11.95%
MKUW.L Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.89%	25.35%	9.15%	-8.87%	5.99%	28.57%	3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FOOD.L and MKUW.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020	0.22

The correlation between FOOD.L and MKUW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOOD.L

FOOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8
FOOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FOOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FOOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FOOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FOOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8

MKUW.L

MKUW.L Risk / Return Rank: 18
MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MKUW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
MKUW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MKUW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MKUW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) and Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOOD.L	MKUW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	0.51	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	0.80	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.10	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	0.70	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	1.63	-1.89

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOOD.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOOD.L and MKUW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOOD.L drawdown since its inception was -47.70%, which is greater than MKUW.L's maximum drawdown of -37.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOOD.L and MKUW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOOD.L	MKUW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.70%	-37.76%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.06%	-7.47%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.15%	-14.16%	-9.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.70%	-25.13%	-22.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.08%	-2.89%	-37.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.63%	-9.42%	-19.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.64%	3.24%	+5.40%

Volatility

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Volatility Comparison

Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) at 2.12%. This indicates that FOOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKUW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOOD.L	MKUW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	2.12%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	8.09%	+4.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	10.37%	+5.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.70%	12.77%	+5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.20%	16.50%	+1.70%

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOOD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MKUW.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOOD.L vs. MKUW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FOOD.L nor MKUW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOOD.L and MKUW.L in my portfolio?

FOOD.L and MKUW.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FOOD.L or MKUW.L?

On fees, FOOD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FOOD.L or MKUW.L?

FOOD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MKUW.L.

What is the main difference between FOOD.L and MKUW.L?

FOOD.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD, while MKUW.L tracks Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FOOD.L and 0.50% for MKUW.L.