FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L
FOOD.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds from Rize ETF tracking the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOOD.L returned -9.02%/yr vs -8.94%/yr for FOGB.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FOOD.L is traded in USD, while FOGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FOGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FOOD.L having a 4.32% return and FOGB.L slightly higher at 4.43%.
FOOD.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- -3.28%
- 3Y*
- -3.92%
- 5Y*
- -9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FOGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- -3.10%
- 3Y*
- -3.83%
- 5Y*
- -8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOOD.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 4.32% | -2.89% | -7.32% | -1.58% | -26.82% | 1.07% | 10.57% |
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 4.43% | -2.66% | -7.29% | -2.07% | -26.99% | 1.63% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOOD.L and FOGB.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FOOD.L and FOGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
FOOD.L
FOGB.L
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOOD.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | -0.12 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | -0.21 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOOD.L drawdown since its inception was -47.70%, roughly equal to the maximum FOGB.L drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOOD.L and FOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOOD.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.70% | -47.61% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -15.90% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.15% | -23.99% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.70% | -47.61% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.08% | -40.01% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.63% | -28.74% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.64% | 8.83% | -0.19% |
Volatility
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that FOOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOOD.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 3.95% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.11% | 11.30% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 15.97% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 18.14% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 17.70% | +0.50% |
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FOOD.L and FOGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
FOOD.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FOOD.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FOOD.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOOD.L and FOGB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
Both ETFs track Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD.
Find the right allocation for FOOD.L and FOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer