PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDTP.L vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDTP.L achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 0.54% return.


IDTP.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.09%
6M
1.17%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
2.62%

BNDW

1D
0.12%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.44%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IDTP.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.09%6.94%2.15%3.71%-12.76%6.17%10.98%8.68%-1.37%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
0.54%5.02%2.42%7.18%-12.88%-2.10%6.22%8.37%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IDTP.L and BNDW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018

0.55

The correlation between IDTP.L and BNDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDTP.L vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDTP.L
IDTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IDTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDTP.LBNDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.21

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

3.42

+3.47

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDTP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDTP.L and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDTP.LBNDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.98

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.05

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.38

+0.13

Drawdowns

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDTP.L drawdown since its inception was -15.12%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTP.L and BNDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTP.LBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.12%

-17.22%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.92%

-2.70%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-4.27%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.12%

-16.93%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.42%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-4.98%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.96%

-0.27%

Volatility

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) have volatilities of 1.30% and 1.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTP.LBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.31%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

2.63%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

3.36%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.13%

5.21%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.37%

4.90%

+1.47%

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDTP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDTP.L vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

IDTP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.21%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%
IDTP.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDTP.L and BNDW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IDTP.L.

IDTP.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BNDW is Global Bonds. IDTP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IDTP.L and 0.05% for BNDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDTP.L and BNDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer