IDT vs. FICO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IDT Corporation (IDT) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO).

Performance

IDT vs. FICO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IDT Corporation (IDT) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IDT vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDT IDT Corporation	-3.98%	8.22%	40.09%	21.02%	-36.21%	257.28%	71.43%	16.48%	-29.46%	-38.46%
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation	-36.86%	-15.08%	71.04%	94.46%	38.03%	-15.14%	36.39%	100.36%	22.06%	28.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IDT : $1.23B FICO : $25.58B
EPS IDT : $4.46 FICO : $27.15
PE Ratio IDT : 11.01 FICO : 39.32
PEG Ratio IDT : 0.76 FICO : 2.09
PS Ratio IDT : 0.98 FICO : 12.54
Total Revenue (TTM) IDT : $1.26B FICO : $2.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) IDT : $465.91M FICO : $1.71B
EBITDA (TTM) IDT : $123.73M FICO : $1.00B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDT achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -36.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IDT has underperformed FICO with an annualized return of 17.26%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.66% annualized return.

IDT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: -3.98%
• 6M: -5.89%
• 1Y: -3.88%
• 3Y*: 13.35%
• 5Y*: 16.76%
• 10Y*: 17.26%

FICO

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -24.25%
• YTD: -36.86%
• 6M: -28.67%
• 1Y: -42.11%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: 16.34%
• 10Y*: 25.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IDT vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDT

IDT Risk / Return Rank: 35
IDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
IDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
IDT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IDT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FICO

FICO Risk / Return Rank: 11
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDT vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDT Corporation (IDT) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDT	FICO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	-0.81	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	-1.02	+1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.86	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	-0.76	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	-1.48	+1.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDT vs. FICO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the FICO Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDT and FICO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDT	FICO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	-0.81	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.42	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.69	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.48	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between IDT and FICO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IDT vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison

IDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDT IDT Corporation	0.51%	0.47%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.68%	8.96%	3.93%	11.75%
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.07%	0.08%

Drawdowns

IDT vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDT drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than FICO's maximum drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDT and FICO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDT	FICO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.05%	-79.26%	-19.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.19%	-54.90%	+21.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.93%	-58.24%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.52%	-58.24%	-14.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.49%	-55.19%	+25.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.53%	-17.82%	-32.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.24%	28.31%	-7.07%

Volatility

IDT vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IDT Corporation (IDT) is 7.30%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 22.06%. This indicates that IDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDT	FICO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.30%	22.06%	-14.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.56%	38.56%	-12.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.89%	52.35%	-16.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.05%	39.49%	+4.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.74%	37.39%	+17.35%

Financials

IDT vs. FICO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IDT Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IDT Corporation reported a gross profit of 121.28M and revenue of 320.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

FICO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 424.70M and revenue of 511.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.0%.

IDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IDT Corporation reported an operating income of 27.63M and revenue of 320.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

FICO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 234.05M and revenue of 511.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

IDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IDT Corporation reported a net income of 51.46M and revenue of 320.52M, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.

FICO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 158.37M and revenue of 511.96M, resulting in a net margin of 30.9%.