PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDT vs. FICO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IDT vs. FICO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IDT Corporation (IDT) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDT achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -35.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IDT has underperformed FICO with an annualized return of 18.12%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.91% annualized return.


IDT

1D
-5.67%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
2.37%
6M
1.24%
1Y
-18.49%
3Y*
26.84%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
18.12%

FICO

1D
-0.51%
1M
-12.02%
YTD
-35.48%
6M
-37.40%
1Y
-39.56%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
25.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDT vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDT
IDT Corporation
2.37%8.22%40.09%21.02%-36.21%257.28%71.43%16.48%-29.46%-38.46%
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
-35.48%-15.08%71.04%94.46%38.03%-15.14%36.39%100.36%22.06%28.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IDT and FICO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2001

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IDT:

$1.30B

FICO:

$25.91B

EPS

IDT:

$3.26

FICO:

$31.51

PE Ratio

IDT:

16.06

FICO:

34.62

PEG Ratio

IDT:

1.11

FICO:

1.84

PS Ratio

IDT:

1.03

FICO:

11.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

IDT:

$1.28B

FICO:

$2.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IDT:

$476.45M

FICO:

$1.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

IDT:

$130.53M

FICO:

$1.16B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDT vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDT
IDT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FICO
FICO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDT vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDT Corporation (IDT) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDTFICODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.87

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.76

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

-1.41

+0.64

IDT vs. FICO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the FICO Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDT and FICO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDT vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDT drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than FICO's maximum drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDT and FICO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTFICODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.05%

-79.26%

-19.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.19%

-52.12%

+18.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.19%

-61.28%

+28.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.93%

-61.28%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.52%

-61.28%

-11.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.82%

-54.21%

+29.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.29%

-18.05%

-32.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.12%

28.07%

-3.95%

Volatility

IDT vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IDT Corporation (IDT) is 10.49%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that IDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTFICODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

12.79%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

39.23%

-21.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.02%

50.94%

-18.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.70%

40.83%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.67%

38.13%

+16.54%

Dividends

IDT vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison

IDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%
IDT
IDT Corporation
0.50%0.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.68%8.96%3.93%11.75%

Financials

IDT vs. FICO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IDT Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
315.71M
691.68M
(IDT) Total Revenue
(FICO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IDT vs. FICO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IDT Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
38.8%
86.8%
Portfolio components
IDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a gross profit of 122.50M and revenue of 315.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

FICO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

IDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported an operating income of 29.90M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

FICO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.

IDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a net income of 21.61M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

FICO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDT and FICO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to IDT (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDT dropped -99.05% vs FICO's -79.26%.

IDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDT and FICO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer