PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDT vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IDT vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IDT Corporation (IDT) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDT achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than T's -9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IDT has outperformed T with an annualized return of 18.12%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.37% annualized return.


IDT

1D
-5.67%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
2.37%
6M
1.24%
1Y
-18.49%
3Y*
26.84%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
18.12%

T

1D
0.41%
1M
-12.51%
YTD
-9.05%
6M
-7.03%
1Y
-16.95%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDT vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDT
IDT Corporation
2.37%8.22%40.09%21.02%-36.21%257.28%71.43%16.48%-29.46%-38.46%
T
AT&T Inc.
-9.05%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IDT and T is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2001

0.23

The correlation between IDT and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

IDT:

$3.26

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

IDT:

16.06

T:

7.26

PEG Ratio

IDT:

1.11

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

IDT:

1.03

T:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

IDT:

$1.28B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IDT:

$476.45M

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

IDT:

$130.53M

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDT vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDT
IDT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDT vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDT Corporation (IDT) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.72

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

-1.54

+0.77

IDT vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDT and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDT vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDT drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDT and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.05%

-64.15%

-34.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.19%

-23.57%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.19%

-23.57%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.93%

-32.01%

-34.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.52%

-42.35%

-30.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.82%

-23.26%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.29%

-15.72%

-34.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.12%

11.06%

+13.06%

Volatility

IDT vs. T - Volatility Comparison

IDT Corporation (IDT) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 7.92%. This indicates that IDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

7.92%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

18.08%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.02%

22.46%

+9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.70%

24.08%

+17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.67%

23.77%

+30.90%

Dividends

IDT vs. T - Dividend Comparison

IDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than T's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDT
IDT Corporation
0.50%0.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.68%8.96%3.93%11.75%
T
AT&T Inc.
5.02%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

IDT vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IDT Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
315.71M
33.47B
(IDT) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IDT and T have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDT has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to T (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDT dropped -99.05% vs T's -64.15%.

IDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDT and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer